Article for friends and clients of LJ Gilland Real Estate Pty Ltd as at 27th November 2012 for your information and perusal.

Property investment proceeds not an alternative to full-time job: Australian buy-to-let landlord survey

By Larry Schlesinger
Tuesday, 27 November 2012

Only one in 20 property investors is making enough money from his or her rental portfolio to no longer have to work full time, according to a landlord survey carried out by research consultancy group BDRC Jones Donald.

Based on an online survey of 500 Australians who own one or more rental properties, it found that just 6% of respondents earn a profitable full-time living from rents paid by their tenants.

Just over a third (35%) derive income from their rental properties to supplement their full-time income, while a quarter (26%) break even on rental activity, and just under a third (32%) make a small loss.

While the report does not delve into the actual dollar earnings of the landlords who are making a living off their rental yields, it does reveal that the average property value for those making a profitable full-time living is $915,000, with these landlords holding a portfolio with an average of 4.3 properties, equating to total average value of $3.9 million.

"Of these people, the average household income is $111,000 before tax," says a spokesperson for BDRC Jones Donald.

Click to enlarge

The most recent statistics from the Australian Tax Office (ATO) for the 2009-2010 tax year show that the majority of property investors own just one investment property, indicating that it is not a full-time occupation for most.

Of the 1.7 million individuals who reported net rental income from rental property in the 2009-2010 tax year, 73% own just one rental property.

The ATO figures also show that 63.4% of property investors with net rental income reported a taxable loss (net rental income less than zero) from their rental property.

Click to enlarge

The results of the Australian Private Property Investor Study also suggest a degree of complacency among landlords about the performance of their investments, with more than a third (34%) being unaware of the rental yield earned on their investments.

This lack of awareness is even higher (40%) for those landlords who manage their own investments, compared with 34% of landlords who use a professional property manager.

Sentiment about property investing remains positive, though, with 77% of Australian landlords feeling very positive about their rental investment and nearly a half of respondents noting an increase in demand from tenants. Only 12% reported a decrease in demand from tenants.

Overall the survey found that landlords are better off financially if they use a property manager both in terms of rental yields achieved and profitability.

Around 20% of landlords that used a property manager earned yields of 6% or more compared with 15% of landlords that managed their properties themselves.

Similarly, 46% of landlord that used a property manager derived a positive income return from their investments compared with just 34% of landlords that that managed their properties themselves.

The findings of the survey indicate that the majority of landlords (77%) use the services of a property manager.

“In the current market, landlords are seeking advice to ensure that their investments are working hard for them,” says Roger Donbavand, managing director of BDRC Jones Donald.

“Along with real estate agent support, six out of 10 landlords would welcome receiving more information and advice from their lender.”

The survey suggests there is some appetite among landlords to increase their investment portfolios, with 21% looking to increase the number of properties they own over the next 12 to 18 months – higher than the 12% who plan to decrease the size of their portfolios.

Half of landlords (48%) don’t plan to make any acquisitions over the next 18 months, while a significant proportion (18%) remain unsure whether to buy or sell.

Donbavand says the study reveals that to get the best results Australian private property investors must consider both houses and units when looking for an investment opportunity.

The Australian Private Property Investor Study has shown that more private property investors have purchased houses over units. However, units may offer better returns in some instances,” he says.

“While Sydney, Perth, Darwin and Canberra all boast increasing unit rental returns, our in-depth research demonstrates that investors who seek real estate advice will see better financial results overall.”

According to the study, the majority of property investors are typically married, professional couples with an average of 1.9 properties in their portfolio.

The study can be purchased in full from BDRC Jones

&

First home buyers’ interest will shift from existing homes to new properties as a result of changes to the First Home Owner grants this week.

Developers will be the short-term winners as a result of the $15,000 First Home Owner Construction Grant introduced on September 11.

However, access to the $7000 First Home Owner grant for pre-existing properties will cease from October 11.

Professionals Everton Park sales agent David Crook said he expected affordable new developments in that price range in outer suburbs such as Ferny Grove and Keperra to see a rise in interest from first home buyers.

But Mr Crook did not expect long-term trends to change.

End to First Home Grant to create "frenzy"

"If people want to buy an older property, instead of applying for the grant they will just save up more,” he said.

Mr Mullaly said first home owners would now be more inclined to buy new properties.

"I’d expect to see things slow down in the market for pre-existing properties,” he said.

"Developments like Glenfern estate at Ferny Grove will increase in demand, which will have the potential to create more value for the area.”

Eatons Hill developer Nic Lulan, from NJ Properties, said the new grant had helped restore buyer confidence in the market.

He said there had been more interest from first home buyers since the new grant was announced last month.

“The housing market within Brisbane is considered to be nearing the bottom with no obvious signs of recovery.”
Brisbane property market stuck in a downswing as investors seek unit bargains: WBP Property Group

By Larry Schlesinger
Thursday, 27 September 2012

Page 1 of 2

There are some signs of a recovery in the Brisbane property market, but it still remains firmly in a downswing , with investors seeking bargains in the unit market as new apartment projects are completed, says WBP Property Group.

WBP places the Brisbane housing and unit market at five o’clock on the property clock.

  • At 12 o’clock the market is at its peak (demand exceeds supply)
  • At 3 o’clock the downswing has set in (an evenly supplied market)
  • By 6 o’clock it has bottomed out (an oversupplied market).
  • At 9 o’clock the market is rebounding (supply tightening)

“The housing market within Brisbane is considered to be nearing the bottom with no obvious signs of recovery,” says WBP.

The valuation and advisory firm says that while recent changes in state government legislation, in particular stamp duty concessions, have improved sales activity and enquiry, Brisbane market conditions will remain as they are until the end of the year.

“Potential buyers and investors are keeping an eye on the effects of the mining boom, which continues to fuel growth, and also public sector job cuts announced by the Newman state government.

WBP says future market factors to watch out for include changes in pricing within the commodities sector and cost cutting within the government.

Looking more closely at the unit market, WBP notes that there are a number of new unit developments in Brisbane that are nearing completion and due to settle.

“Many purchasers who have bought off the plan have seen prices come off from original date of contract. Investors still remain wary as to when the bottom will be and are on the lookout for a bargain buy,” says WBP

“This market trend is due to continue till the end of the year and perhaps into 2013.

“The Queensland government has introduced a $15,000 concession for first-home buyers looking to buy a new property.

“The unit market in the sub $400,000 range still continues to be strong amongst professionals looking for lifestyle, inner-city locations,” it says. End of article.

Information For Clients, Friends & Associates of LJ Gilland Real Estate Pty Ltd as follows:-

Please keep a look out for our website translated to Chinese.

Online residential listings rise 1.5% in August to 373,510, led by Melbourne, Sydney and Canberra

By Jonathan Chancellor
Wednesday, 05 September 2012

Vendors appear hopeful of better fortunes this spring selling season with the total number of residential properties listed for sale online rising 1.5% over August to reach 373,510, according to figures from SQM Research.

This contrasts starkly with the same time last year, when listings fell 3.8% from 377,213 in July 2011 to 362,740 in August 2011.

Sydney and Melbourne both recorded “substantial” 5.9% increases in monthly residential properties listed for sale, to reach 31,310 and 51,194 listings respectively.

Click to enlarge

SQM Research managing director Louis Christopher described market conditions as a little better than this time last year, "but it doesn’t mean we are going to head into a big property boom”.

"If rates stay on hold, that will be conducive to stimulating the housing market, and we are likely to see continued market recovery, but there are many X-factors at play,” he told news.com.au.

Christopher says rising rents (up 7% annually over the past five years) are good news for investors, but they have been offset by declining house prices.

He expects there will be further seasonal rises in stock levels as the spring selling season enters full swing.

Click to enlarge

While residential stock on market in Sydney is just 0.9% higher than a year ago at 31,310, Melbourne has the highest year-on-year increase of all the mainland capital cities, with stock up 14.1% to 51,194 in August.

In August last year there were 44,859 properties listed for sale in Melbourne.

The other notable increase was Canberra, where stock on market increased by 8.8% over the month to 3,758 online listings. This is up 13.6% up on August 2011.

“Canberra’s large monthly increase may well signify a downturn for that market as federal budget spending is cut,” noted SQM research.

Bucking the monthly trend of rising stock levels was Perth, which recorded the largest monthly decline of 1.8% to 18,053. Residential listings were down 10.7% on the same time last year when there 20,207 listings.

Residential stock levels have declined in Perth, Darwin and Brisbane – which all benefit from Australia’s mining boom

Darwin residential listings are down 23.3% over the 12 months to August to 1,282 while Brisbane listings are down 4.7% to 28,666.

“Increasingly the market is segmented. It is becoming difficult to discuss just one national housing market and in my opinion, that will be to base line story for the remainder of 2012,” said Louis Christopher, managing director of SQM Research.

While Hobart stock on market declined by 1.7% over August to 4,388 properties listed for sale, there are 24.1% more properties for sale than a year ago. At this time last year there were 3,536 listed for sale in Hobart.

Have you seen the new video explaining advertising options on realestate.com.au? It could be a great listing tool to use in your presentations?

http://sellingguide.realestate.com.au/video/why-list-online

Also, here is the link to the Selling Guide website specifically set up for our sellers.

http://sellingguide.realestate.com.au/

Best regards,

Linda & Carlos Debello

http://www.ljgrealestate.com.au

http://twitter.com/GillandDebello

http://au.linkedin.com/in/lindajanedebello

http://gillandrealestate.wordpress.com/

http://www.facebook.com/pages/LJ-Gilland-Real-Estate-Pty-Ltd/169194919788253

Confidential email:- The information in this message is intended for the recipient name on this email. If you are not the recipient please do not read, copy distribute or act upon the message as the information it contains may be privileged. If you have received this message in error, please notify the writer by return email. Thank you very much for your assistance in this matter and your co-operation.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s